May 24, 2018 at 2:12 am
Check beneath, are some completely unrelated sites to ours, nevertheless, they are most trustworthy sources that we use.
See in context
May 17, 2018 at 11:38 am
You poѕsibly can play it anytime yоu want.? Dadrdy answered.
?Because speakiing about how nice Goԁ is makes him comfortable and its worship.
Play іt before you fall asleep tonight and if you get up within the morning and God shall be near you
alll day long.
May 7, 2018 at 11:02 pm
Hey! Would you mind if I share your blog with my zynga group?
There’s a lot of folks that I think would really enjoy your content.
Please let me know. Many thanks
May 2, 2018 at 12:50 am
I really enjoyed this point. It is great how you show how important this intervention is but also how challenging.
May 2, 2018 at 12:46 am
I agree with Victor. It should be phrased otherwise, maybe repeats instead of patterns because this is what it is: STRs.
May 2, 2018 at 12:44 am
[If DNA testing shows that parent and child do not share enough of the same chromosomal patterns, there is no automatic immigration process to continue the investigation of the claim.]
A very good point though it is even more complicated. The DNA test shows that the man and the women are the biological parents of two of the children and the women is also the biological mother of the other two. So by proxy of the mother, the father is related to all of them too. In Germany for example, this constellation would be sufficient for family reunification. As you rightly point out it is a reality that Canadian immigration officials create and the story could easily be told a different way even with the use of DNA.
May 2, 2018 at 12:36 am
[Part of this has to do with the modern truth claims of science, and another part rests on the 21st century fascination with new technologies.]
There is a third explanation that is somewhat related to it: It is a convenient way for immigration officials. Convenient because they think they do not have to deal with messy documents and because there is seemingly no doubt about the interpretation (it seems to be a yes/no answer).
May 2, 2018 at 12:33 am
[“the populations and population-specified markers that are identified and studied mirror the cultural, racial, ethnic, national, and tribal understandings of the humans who study them” (TallBear 2013: 5). That is, DNA testing rests on categories of belonging that do not necessarily belong to the group being tested.]
I am not quite sure whether the quote works here for two reasons. Firstly, I think the argument is rather complex and would require some more information and details in order to be easily understood. Secondly, DNA testing for family reunification does not necessarily rely on populations and population-specified markers. Population statistics are still used but they are not necessary in order to get sufficient results. That does not invalidate the overall argument of the importance of the social context in which the tests are used. But as I said I think the quote goes to far or makes a different point than what is needed for the argument in this chapter.
May 1, 2018 at 10:26 pm
I really enjoyed reading this chapter. It is well written and makes important points. It also adds new facets to the existing social science literature which is fantastic. Joly (2017) DNA testing for family reunification in Canada: Points to Consider. Journal of International Migration and Integration 18(2). It is more of a legal piece but could still be interesting to look at.
May 1, 2018 at 10:21 pm
[The presumption of the Canadian government official was that Tashi knew about his wife’s infidelity and lied about it. However, while DNA may suggest infidelity, it does not decide family.]
This section skips some steps or explanations. Even if the DNA test might suggests infidelity (there are plenty of other explanations) it not only does not decide family, it also does not say anything about whether or not Tashi knew.